#HOW TO GET MORE FRAMES IN ARMA 3 HOW TO#

Stale Moves affect advantage/disadvantage and occur when hitting a character as well as when hitting a shield.

This includes projectiles which are active for a very long time and thus become much more advantaged the later they hit.

On Shield advantage/disadvantage data assumes the move hits on its first Active Frame (hitting on a later active frame would be a meaty and can gain additional advantage relative to the later active frames).

So a 6 frame grab would be 10 frames out of shield. Grabs used to happen instantly out of shield as well, but Ultimate added 4 frames to Grabs done after a hit connects with a shield. Aerials have 3 frames added to them because it takes 3 frames to leave the ground, so a 3 frame aerial would be 6 frames out of shield. So, since some characters have a 3 frame Up B, -3 would be unsafe against those characters. HUGE EXCEPTION: Jump, Up B, and Up Smash out of shield ignore Shield Drop frames. So if all else was equal, you could be as disadvantaged as -11 on an attack and still be 'neutral'. However, in Smash there is Shield Drop which takes 11 frames in Ultimate.

In most games, being negative means you can't apply pressure since the defending opponent would be able to act before you as the attacker. Negative meaning the defender can act before the attacker. About On Shield data: The +/- refers to who can act first after an attack hits a shield.Grab after an attack hits your shield takes an additional 4 frames and does not incur Shield Drop.Jumping out of shield takes 3 frames and does not incur Shield Drop.Up B and Up Smash happen instantly out of shield and do not incur Shield Drop.Dropping your shield ( Shield Drop) takes 11 frames.Shield Stun is the amount of frames that the defender is stuck after Shield Lag ends. Shield Lag is just extra freeze frames that both the attacker and defender suffer, so it does not affect frame advantage.Those are the most common ways I've seen it implemented in Arma 1,2,3.It costs $100 a year for the privilege to post an app on the Apple Store.

#HOW TO GET MORE FRAMES IN ARMA 3 HOW TO#

Most decently made missions will at least have some instructions on how to do this in the info on the map screen if it's possible in that mission. It can varyВ from having a keyboard key bring up a menu, to having to be near a specific ingame object (Flag pole, bulletin board, ammo box, whatever the mission maker decides) which adds an option to adjust view distance to your action menu (options that come up when you scroll your mouse wheel). This can be confusing as it's up to each mission maker how this is implemented. They are instead hard coded by the mission maker or adjustable from within the mission. Multiplayer missions generally do not follow the view distance you set in you video settings. Aim for 2-3k maybe less if your playing in towns or forests for that mission. Anything above about 5km is generally overkill because objects and units don't show up past that anyway. Try reducing that and see if you can get acceptable performance.

View Distance is a huge FPS hog in Arma aswell. I do not see any possibility for better performance without a faster CPU, if this is a 'real' CPU bottleneck situation. My prediction is that by increasing graphical detail the OP is going to see one of two scenarios play out: better visuals with no apparent framerate penalty (since it's just using the excess GPU capacityВ that was sitting unused before) or, if he increases the detail to the point where the GTX 970 is starting to struggle, he may see performance decrease a bit as the bottleneck shifts back to the GPU. The CPU isn't doing more work when there's a lighter graphical load it's that with a light graphical load, the GPU is removed as the bottleneck and CPU performance becomes more apparent as it begins to be what limits the game's framerate.В The CPU is basically doing the same work either way, and therefore it generally hits the same framerate limit regardless of what the video card's workload is. The GPU is still rendering the game either way. Running games in LOW settings on high end hardware, can sometimes be MORE taxing The 8350 is not the best CPU, especially not for ARMA, but what i said should hold true Agreed, but if the GPU is doing no work then you can offset that by making the GPU work more, thus removing the bottleneck off the CPU (since the CPU is basically rendering the game instead of the GPU)

How to get more frames in arma 3